Elect Barack Obama
Impeach Bush & Cheney!
"Google" your Voter Registration
Register to Vote
Vote Early-Absentee-Nov4
Visit the Democratic Party
User loginNavigation![]() "The 35 Articles of Impeachment and the Case for Prosecuting George W. Bush" is available for $12; a free downloadable PDF is also available. |
Democratic Voices on Bush Stem Cell VetoAs everyone expected, George W. Bush yesterday took the path even more toward the Religious Right and away from science and enlightenment when he vetoed the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act, which had just passed the Senate on Tuesday after passage in the House of Representatives in 2005. The bill, H.R. 810, went immediately back to the House, where a vote of 235 to 193, fell 51 short of the two-thirds majority required to override Bush's rejection of the bill that would have expanded embryonic stem-cell research and given hope to millions of Americans suffering life-threatening and crippling illnesses. "If this bill were to become law, American taxpayers for the first time in our history would be compelled to fund the deliberate destruction of human embryos," said Bush. "Crossing this line would be a grave mistake and would needlessly encourage a conflict between science and ethics that can only do damage to both and harm our nation as a whole." I guess to this president, stem cell research is bad for our society, but it's just fine to have taxpayers fund the killing of tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens for no reason whatsoever. Here's some reactions from Congressional Democrats: Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) “I am extremely disappointed in the president’s veto and will do everything I can to make sure this groundbreaking research proposal still becomes law. Only one of the bills we passed Tuesday delivers real promise for a cure to millions of Americans. Yet this is the bill the president vetoed. The federal government should not stand in the way of a cure for some of the most debilitating diseases faced by Americans today.” Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) “President Bush may have vetoed the stem cell bill today, but he has not vetoed the hopes of millions of Americans. Those families who wake up every morning to face another day with a deadly disease or a disability will not forget this decision by the President to stand in the way of sound science and medical research. “President Bush’s first veto makes him the first president in the history of the United States to restrict medical research and the efforts of science to reduce suffering from disease and disability. Many of us in Congress, along with the vast majority of American families, will continue to fight until the promise of stem cell research is fully realized.” Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) “I will mince no words about the President’s action. This veto is a shameful display of cruelty and hypocrisy. It is cruel, because it denies hope to millions of Americans who suffer from Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, ALS, juvenile diabetes, cancer, spinal-cord injuries, and many other diseases and debilitating conditions. Most of all, though, it is simply sad. “HR 810 would have expanded federal funding to pursue this research. But with a stroke of his pen today, the President vetoed this bill and vetoed the hopes of millions of suffering Americans. “There is an election in November, and we need to know where every candidate stands on embryonic stem cell research. Because we intend to reintroduce this bill in the next Congress. And we intend to prevail.” House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) "Imagine: the first veto of this President is for a bill that has the miraculous power to cure. The Latin translation of veto means, 'I forbid.' President Bush has said today: 'I forbid allowing the best and brightest minds to pursue the science that they believe has the most promise and potential to cure. I forbid bringing embryonic stem cell research under NIH, ensuring the strict controls and stringent ethical guidelines that only NIH can impose. I forbid giving our scientists the opportunities they need to ensure our nation remains pre-eminent in science.' Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) "Mr. President, we are here to say that as long as there is a need for the hope and help that stem cell research can bring, it will never be forgotten. As long as restrictions based on a narrow ideology block progress to new cures, this issue will never be closed. "Mr. President, you can veto a bill, but you can't veto hope. We will be back again and again and again until we end the cruel restrictions on lifesaving research that are denying hope to millions of American patients and their families.” Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) "With his veto, President Bush chose politics over people. "The Scopes trial took place in 1925. Sadly, President Bush’s veto today shows that we haven’t progressed much since then. The United States cannot enter the 21st Century believing the Earth is flat. We need to celebrate science in this nation – not reject it. "With a stroke of a pen today, President Bush undermined common sense. The President proved he is captive to ideologues and extremists in his political party. What the President did today was not compassionate, nor even conservative. It was an extreme action and history will hold him accountable.” Representative Diana DeGette (D-CO) “I am extremely disappointed that President Bush has issued his first veto on H.R. 810. With his veto, the President has destroyed the hope of millions of Americans who are suffering from diseases like Parkinson’s and diabetes that could be cured by stem cell research. “H.R. 810 would have corrected the President’s short-sighted policy by allowing this important research to move forward under ethical constraints. This research holds so much promise to solving diseases that affect more than 110 million Americans. Vetoing this bill is one of the greatest mistakes of his Presidency. “This research has the support of more than 70% of Americans and the President will suffer the political consequences for vetoing H.R. 810. I promise to keep fighting to expand stem cell research. This important legislation will become law; it’s only a matter of when.” You can reach Bob Geiger at geiger.bob@gmail.com
|
What's HotStop Bush from Pardoning Himself and Cheney PaulsonWatch: No Bailouts for Bush's Cronies
Replace Bush Democrats
Escrow to Keep Obama Progressive Local: connect with Democrats.com members in your State, County, and Congressional District Are you really registered to vote? "Google" your voter registration to find out Ten Reasons to Impeach Bush & CheneyNo Pardons for Bush-CheneyOut of Iraq PetitionForumsPollShould Congress Give Paulson $700 Billion Blank Check? Yes 1% No 99% Total votes: 257 Protest and Organize! |
Very Disappointing!
I'm a gran mal epileptic and I have to say that this is one of the most ridiculous mistakes that Mr. Bush could have ever made. Why would someone vote down a bill that could save millions of lives? Why would the leader of the free world veto a bill that would aid in the research and development of treatments to cure countless health problems? I hate to be a bit graphic, but at least the fetuses aren't being thrown to the trash, they are being used in research toward medical science. Some politicians should take their religion off of their sleeve and look at the bigger picture. The presidency is not about personal opinion, it's about what's best for a nation! President Bush uses his religious convictions as a compass for his work in office, rather than being a sensible leader of our "so called" democracy. This veto will not keep me from having hope that one day there will be more developments in neurological treatment for others that suffer from the same or similar disorders.
Dubya has no religious
Dubya has no religious convictions, nor a moral compass. He is a puppet of the radical religious-right because they helped to elect him.
The members of Congress who support him on this "first-ever veto" are made from the same cloth. It's all about money and power, and has nothing to do what is good for the country, nor the world.
And Bush has given the
And Bush has given the 'moderate' Republicans in Congress who voted for it to better their chances of re-election all the cover they need with their constituents---all the while the program of the Deathhead Party is implemented.
It's like when Delay allowed 'moderate' Republicans to vote the way their constituents wanted them to as long as DeLay had the votes to pass or defeat the legislation he desired.
To drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of liberty, and call upon him to join you in joyous anthems, were inhuman mockery and sacrilegious irony.
Frederick Douglass, July 4, 1852
RE: Very Disappointed!
I completely agree. Religion, of any sort, has NO place in our politics. They are two completely separate things. But it's astounding how many people do not see it that way. It's sad.
We really need to elect a progressive, forward-thinking, not-too-religious Democrat to the presidential office in '08. Only that way can we correct all of Dubya's mistakes.
Yes, I agree we need to keep....
our government religion free.
That is the only way we can
guarantee equality under our
Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Beyond Enraged
Yep, the guy is a "man of his word"! He's said all along he would veto the bill and, by golly, he did just that! How utterly infuriating! I read an article sometime back (wish I'd kept it) that seemed to say that the 400,000 embryos in "storage" will eventually have to be destroyed because their viability for baby production will deteriorate over time?? (Any medical/scientific experts out there to explain whether or not that is true?) Anyway....IF that is the case, it strikes me that "destroying" embryos for purposes of research that just might bring relief to those suffering from the legion of diseases afflicting a large segment of the population makes one hell of a lot more sense than DESTROYING these same embryos just because their shelf life has lapsed?? Am I making any damn sense at all??? Bush is driven by his religious zelot base...wonder how he'd react if one of the twins suffered a disease that might have been helped by the research he's so arrogantly dismissed....hmmmm??? The man clearly has his head up his.....well, another portion of his anatomy.
On the Al Franken show, I
On the Al Franken show, I heard that 60-80% of the embryos a woman produces are flushed out as waste under ordinary circumstances. It would be wonderful if all women sent Bush their bodily wastes so Bush (with the willling help of Brownback, I'm sure) could save all of those snowflakes.
To drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of liberty, and call upon him to join you in joyous anthems, were inhuman mockery and sacrilegious irony.
Frederick Douglass, July 4, 1852
The only silver lining about
The only silver lining about this is that most of these pharmaceutical companies are multi national. With this in mind, most of the research that would have been performed here, will be continued abroad. Hopefully that our next president will see a clearer path toward passing the bill that Mr. Bush vetoed.
Poll: Majority of public disapprove of Bush's stem cell veto
Let's see, 61% say he vetoed the bill for moral (religious) reasons and 32% said he vetoed the bill for politcal (partisian) reasons. Simple math says that only leaves 7% or 93% think Bush either vetoed the bill for theocratic reasons to appease the religious right or despotic reasons as in to keep control of the House & Senate.
My point and question is this:
If 93% of this country are thinking about religion and partisianship, does that mean only 7% of us are thinking about promoting the General Welfare and Posterity of this country?
Source: USA Today
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-07-25-poll-stem-cell_x.htm?...
"If being liberal means critical thinking and informed dissent, instead of blind obedience and ignorant nationalism, then I am all for it!"