Media, Not Military, Alerted Bush to Haditha Massacre
White House Press Secretary Tony "Snowjob" Snow said today that Mr. Bush first learned of killing of two dozen Iraqi civilians at Haditha from the press"when a Time reporter first made the call." "Snowjob" resisted answering directly when asked what Bush's "personal involvement" has been, saying "I'm not going to get into his personal involvement." Excuse me? A mass murder by US military personnel may have occurred, and your "values" guide you to duck and dodge questions without so much as "Let me look into it and follow-up?"
So some of the questions are: Why wasn't Bush briefed by the military? Why was he kept in the dark? Where did the reporting responsibility for Haditha stop, and why?
The Marine assault on Iraqi civilians, including seven women, and three children, all unarmed except for one, occurred November 19, 2005, and was first reported by Time more than four months later on March 27, 2006. Kilo Company, 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment has since rotated back to California, and the battalion commander and two company commanders were relieved of duty.
The assault followed the death of a Marine Lance Corporal killed when his humvee was hit by an IED. If true, the event is the worst case of deliberate killing of Iraqi civilians by US service members since the war began, according to human rights activists.
Time reports that the military stood by its original contention that the Iraqi civilians were killed by an insurgent bomb until January, 2006, when Time delivered a video of the aftermath and witness statements to Colonel Barry Johnson, a US military spokesman in Baghdad. He passed the evidence up the command, recommending a "a full and formal investigation." In February, an infantry colonel determined after a week long investigation that the civilians had been killed by Marines, citing the deaths as "collateral damage" not malicious intent by the Marines, according to investigators. The US government has already paid relatives of the victims $2,500 for each of the dead civilians, and lesser amounts to the injured.
Two sets of photos have surfaced. One set was taken by someone in Kilo Company, and one Marine emailed a photo taken of the Haditha aftermath back to the states. A Marine intelligence team apparently deleted photos of the scene because they had no intelligence information of value. It is expected that at least some members of Kilo Company will be charged, quite possibly including for murder, which carries the death penalty under the military's legal system, the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Two weeks ago, Marine officials briefed members of Congress. Sunday, decorated Marine officer and Pennsylvania congressman John Murtha, the ranking Democrat on the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee in the House, told George Stephanopoulous of ABC's This Week that if the allegations against Kilo Company Marines are true, Haditha is "worse than Abu Ghraib," calling their actions war crimes committed "in cold blood." "These kind of things have to be brought out immediately," he told "because if the Marines got away with it, other Marines might think it's okay."
Ironically, Congressman Murtha submitted HR 73, a resolution to remove forces from Iraq, two weeks after the Haditha massacre but while he was unaware of it.
Murtha enlisted in the Marines to serve in the Korean War. He rose through the ranks, becoming first a drill instructor at Parris Island, and then was selected for Officer Candidate School. After discharge from active duty, he remained in the reserves, then volunteered for service in Vietnam in 1966-67 and was assigned as a battalion intelligence officer.
The following year, 1968, the My Lai massacre occurred when between 347 and 504 civilians were murdered by US forces. As a result, the Medina standard was established. It holds that a commanding officer, being aware of a human rights violation or a war crime, will be held criminally liable when he does not take action.
Which brings us back to why the Commander in Chief was informed of the military's assault on Haditha civilians by the media instead of the military chain of command.
Who is in charge here?
- Chip's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version- Send to friend


Message to Mr. Bush...
Ignorance is not the equivalent of innocence.
You didn't know about Katrina until New Orleans was nearly washed away. You didn't know about Haditha until newsmen raised questions.
Isn't this the Ken Lay "defense"...you know, "yes, I had the authority" and "yes, I got paid the big bucks" but "no, none of this was my responsibility"?
I see no reason it should work any better for you than it did for Kenny Boy.
Is your "straight from the mouth of God" mechanism breaking down?
Bush's Ancestry
According to the historians that I have read, there are no known documents linking Hitler to the Holecaust. If Hitler had stuck around for Nuremburg, he would have had a colorable claim to the no-nothing defense. For Bush, on the other hand, there is a documentary trail that chains him to his war crimes (e.g., the torture memos and Bush's signing statement for McCain's anti-torture amendment).
'Ignorance & Mistake'...
could be a 'good defense'...
either for the Marines [alleged allegations] --or for G W Bush...either way this story had legs --but got cut-off by someone @ the White House --and later surfaced -- the same way --
WMD's, $9B missing in Iraq, AbuGraib, Gitmo, NSA spying, corruption and all the other stories that seem to describe this White House [President] and all the usual suspects....
I just wish Bush would stop being a 'vivid liar'; and accept the fact that he's 'NOT EXEMPT'..from telling the 'truth'!!
CNN Reporting Two Iraqi Women Killed by US Troops
One woman was pregnant.
ABC Reporting Three Unarmed Iraqi Civilians Killed by US Forces
ABC Reporting Three Unarmed Iraqi Civilians Killed by US Forces
"In the latest instance where Iraqis say U.S. forces have shed innocent blood, relatives and Iraqi police and army officers in Samarra, north of Baghdad, told Reuters U.S. troops killed three unarmed civilians, including a 60-year-old woman and a mentally handicapped man, in their home three weeks ago.
A U.S. spokesman said only three guerrillas were killed."
War Crimes
According to Democracy Now, the Iraqis were not surprised by this latest atrocity. It's a daily event. Occcupiers always think the occupied are less than human. Then we have 20,000-30,000 mercenaries who are NOT subject to the military code or Iraqi law reportedly killing Iraqis for sport. The occupation troops are just another militia gone wild.
Dollars to donuts the US troops were not trained to minimize civilian casualties in a counter-insurgency often fought in urban areas. The Carter Center and the Red Cross have said that about 9 civilians die for every combatant killed in these situations.
This is all on the heads of Bush, Rumsfeld and the military command structure. But you can bet no officer will be held responsible. As they said at Nuremburg, initiating an aggressive war is the ultimate war crime because it leads to all the other war crimes.
Rotating troops for 3 or 4 tours in this mess is going to desensitize them. This is Viet Nam all over again.
The real crime is that the American people are only made aware of these atrocities if there are pictures or film to document the horrors. Maybe that's why more journalists have been killed in Iraq. Or that the occupation troops detain journalists and have sent at least one to Gitmo.
The longer the US troops are in Iraq, the more sectarian violence there will be when we're finally kicked-out. Before we invaded, Iraq was a secular state where Sunnis and Shias lived together and intermarrried.
Bush is a barbarian. War profiteering is the only reason we are in Iraq. Bush wants to control Iraqi oil to keep the prices high.