
Author: An American Physicist.
GOAL: THE LARGEST EXPANSION OF THE MIDDLE CLASS IN HISTORY.
_______________________________________
Liberal and Conservative folks have been tied in knots by half truths. We must end the era of Political NonScience, and enact a plan to make work pay again. We begin by examining some Myths.
.
Myth 1: Winner Take All
MYTH: Republicans believe in Winner take all. Democrats believe in taking from the Winner.
FALSE: Republicans break Monopolies by voting for Anti-Monopoly Laws, Time Limited Patent Laws, etc. to establish Aristocracy. Democrats break Monopolies by voting for the above plus a Progressive Income Tax to establish a Middle Class. All Parties take from the Winner via the voting booth.
.
Myth 2: Monopolies of Many
MYTH: Monopolies occur whenever one company takes the lead.
FALSE: Monopolies occur whenever the number of companies involved is small enough for implicit collusion to occur. Such companies simply look over each others shoulders to see what similar companies are charging, and providing as wages, and do in kind. Many companies are no longer competing. ---If they did, they would do like small businesses do, and scramble to cut the fat. Instead, for example, historic CEO salaries remain: up to ~$100,000/hour. In the past, when men kept them honest, the CEO made approximately 50 times the average worker. Now it’s 500 times.
.
Myth 3: Trickle Down Economics
MYTH: The rich need more in order to stimulate the economy.
FALSE: Look at the chart:

Does the man in blue need more in order to stimulate the economy?
.
“…state and local taxes are so strongly regressive that they cancel out much of the progressivity of the federal tax.” - (Scientific American)
“Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% …” And “Long-term problems include inadequate investment in economic infrastructure, rapidly rising medical and pension costs of an aging population, sizable trade and budget deficits, and stagnation of family income in the lower economic groups.” - (C.I.A. factbook)
.
MYTH 4: Ethics of the Progressive Income Tax
MYTH: Progressive Income Taxes always TAKE from the Winner.
FALSE: Winners are asked to pay for services rendered. Wars are fought to defend a Nation. Citizens should pay that portion of the defense budget in PROPORTION to that portion of the Nation which they OWN, and therefore need defending. Military Welfare should end.
FALSE: A Nation that needs defending requires a child to be raised for 18 years. Some portion of that economic burden needs to be paid by those who require that same 18 year old. The infinite spiritual burden of a soldier’s death can never be repaid but the economic burden before enlistment, and after a death with lose of lifetime wages to their family, should. To a lesser extent this is also true elsewhere. Employers need ADULTS in order to make money.
.
MYTH 5: Everyone has the Same Chance
MYTH: Everyone has the same chance in proportion to their abilities and willingness to work.
FALSE: If we were to all start over, then we would all have the same chance. It is fact that once someone starts with money, acquiring more is trivial. Unfortunately, money made by some great economic engine of our past, passed on within a family tree, often finds itself in the hands of a dullard.
.
MYTH 6: Stimulating Effects of the Progressive Income Tax
MYTH: It does not matter who holds the money.
FALSE: Invention changes everything! The same cash in the hands of the creative yields far more than the zero sum manipulations of an economic dullard. If the Progressive Income Tax is used to pay for something that the Free Market would be proud to own then it is stimulus. On the other hand, idle Wealth is not. Freeing up capitol to be used by the vast majority –including, therefore, the majority of potential economic powerhouses is greatly stimulus.
.
MYTH 7: How to get Rich
MYTH: You get rich on your own power.
FALSE: Here is HOW TO GET RICH:
1) Get people to work for a low enough wage or charge a lot.
2) Invent a product which increases your AND other people’s wealth.
Aristocrats view number 1 as holy writ. Communists view it as evil. Americans need simply note its truth. Employers need employees in order to make money. Free Enterprise slices both ways.
.
MYTH 8: Who Gets Rich
MYTH: Non wealthy people are not smart or industrious enough to get rich.
FALSE: Some are, some are not. Many simply focus their energies on their passions and their families rather than vying for increased compensation. I have met policeman, fireman, soldiers, scientists, and laborers who were easily as sharp and industrious as those who vie for increased perks. Presently, those at the top are living off the welfare of those who are capable, but do not bother to pursue increased compensation. Just ask your neighborhood cop. The able bodied offer Welfare to those above and it is enjoyed without a bit of thanks. Able Bodied Welfare should end.
.
MYTH 9: Work Hard or Work Smart
MYTH: If everyone just worked hard and/or got an education then everyone would move up the ladder and they could stop complaining.
FALSE: If everyone did that nobody, on average, would move up the ladder. Other than invention, wages are a zero sum game. Presently, the “advice” in this myth is given to encourage lower wage earners not to seek greater compensation for the work they do, so that those above them can gain greater compensation for the work that they do. Previously this advice was given simply to encourage real increased efficiencies in the work force.
.
MYTH 10: Free Enterprise, the Phrase
This Myth simply involves using a phrase and forgetting its heart. Free Enterprise does 2 things:
1) Arrive at prices and wages commensurate with each group’s willingness/ability to battle over them so as to arrive at low prices and wages via relatively peaceful means.
2) Reflect our shared value of “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”
I would encourage all Americans to strive for these lofty goals!
------------END OF MYTH----------------------
-----------------THE ACT---------------------
The American Middle Class Restoration Act
GOAL: THE LARGEST EXPANSION OF THE MIDDLE CLASS IN HISTORY.
PREAMBLE
Communism---Socialism---AMERICA---Aristocracy---Monarchy
- The goals of Free Enterprise have been thwarted by Aristocracy.
- Americans do not believe in Winner Take All. The American Experiment has two corrective measures against Aristocracies (old money/swindling) and Monopolies (explicit/implicit):
- Refusing lesser salaries until those wishing to make money via the labor of others, decide to offer greater salaries.
- The voting booth. Soldiers, Fireman, Police, etc., for love of country, family, or passion, forgo seeking greater compensation as above and rely instead on the voting booth via Anti Monopoly Laws, Time Limited Patents, the Progressive Income Tax, etc.
- We are sold on the goals of Free Enterprise. While Americans eschew idle wealth, and privilege over merit (Aristocracy), we also eschew forcing wages which would cause individuals to reject the work they would gravitate towards otherwise (Socialism).
- Americans use the voting booth ONLY if they have decided that withholding labor would achieve the very same result. It is posited that presently, those at the top, would do their jobs for lower compensation (as their predecessors did), thereby ensuring greater compensation for the vast majority.
- It is not enough to know that there is dead weight at the top, but worry about exceptions. A real danger exists now. The bottom 90% have been cut off from good wages for so long that America is suffering from a lack of booming economics, academic advances, and the maximum level of military preparedness.
The American Middle Class Restoration Act
Restoring America to a Time When Courage and Work Paid.
-------------------------------------------------------
PROVISION 1: 50% INCREASE IN PAY FOR ALL ACTIVE DUTY AND RESERVE MILITARY PERSONEL.
REVENUE NEUTRAL MEANS:
- Soldiers risk and often sacrifice their lives. Citizens can pay proper respect upon demise by locking up only half of their estate within family lines. The remaining half being plowed back into America by paying the increase above.
- Partial Closed Loop Economics defends America from Aristocracy by providing a partially level playing field against “old” money. Privilege over merit should be limited. Ensuring that one’s children never have to work is one thing. Ensuring that family lines never have to work, whilst Soldiers sacrifice, is quite another.
--------------------------------------------
PROVISION 2: ZERO INCOME TAX ON NECESSARY INCOME: THE FIRST $60,000 MADE EACH YEAR BY EVERY AMERICAN.
REVENUE NEUTRAL MEANS:
- The first $60,000 made each year by every American shall be exempt from income tax. Each additional dollar taxed at ~38%. (Presently, revenue neutrality would require ~48% on additional dollars, but once economic activity from the bottom 90% kicks in, the rate is greatly reduced.)
- The first dollars made are needed for living, bootstrapping businesses, and raising children for the workforce or military service. Further, dollars in the hands of the Middle Class find their way more easily to the poor, in the finest traditions of American charity.
The ACT’S provisions are the same for all Americans. We must decide if, from birth, we are willing to abide by them.
The contributions that the vast majority are called to make, at present, are three fold:
- To continue to work, and live with, semi-monopoly restricted low wages and high prices.
- To raise children for 18 years (an economic challenge) and offer them up, if the need arises, to defend this Nation with their lives (an infinite spiritual challenge).
- To continue to pay regressive State and Local Taxes.
The ACT marks a return to the notion that the American Dream of a strong Middle Class Life is part and parcel to America herself. It recognizes the Economic stimulus possible when Dad and Mom, Aunt and Uncle, friend and neighbor ALL have extra cash in their pockets, and dreams to pursue.
Coulter is a Communist
Please note that the Myths above carry with them far more than at first site. For example, Myth 1 shows Coulter and Limbaugh to be Hippy Communists by their own standards.
Great job
Very well put together. I read it over but will have to read it again to digest it all. Myth 3 is one that I am so disgusted we even have to disprove again. I remember the glorious trickle down "Reagan 80s" much to well. White beans and cornbread and bologna on Fridays. Why in the hell anyone wanted to go back to that when mad cowboy came along I'll never understand. What I really want to fight for and I believe is touched on here is that we need to stop business from gutting all the high paying jobs. It is not communist for a worker to negotiate for a fair wage for their work. It is a myth that you can do your best and naturally make it in this country. You can go to college for a high paying job that are all being outsourced so they can pay someone 50 cents a day. Look at all the industries that working American built this country with. The textile industry has been gutted. The steel industry is gone. The high tech industries are gone. Everything I grew up hearing was great to get into has been outsourced. Isn't it un-American to let the industries and workers that built our country die? Its not like they are dying due to progress or ingenuity, its all about greed. This is something I think we should pound the hell out of. That is why I really like Edwards and his two Americas theme. I see it like him, they have for my whole life been trying to create two Americas, one for the haves, and one for the have nots. I won't go into it much but I believe anyone who stood in the way have been eliminated or politically destroyed. After Kennedy despite the Carter and Clinton years we are right back to creating two Americas, one for us, whose children die in meaningless wars and labor ourselves into early graves for that little sliver at the top of the chart, and them, the wealthy who are favored and pretty much get to do what the hell they want to everyone else. I have dedicated whats left of my life to fighting against it and exposing it for what it is. Sorry I got into a rant there, I will read it some more and absorb it. I look foward to seeing your other ideas.
So true Rich and thanks. I
So true Rich and thanks. I hear ya. As you pointed out, Myth 3 is amazing. I note below that we need to let that graphic, or a similar one, just sit with Americans WITHOUT any text and let their minds do with it what they may. My feeling is, over time, it will eventually strike them as “what the F”.
Words sometimes can’t do that. I am also thinking that the number of words often needs to be reduced and opinions need to coalesce around certain core ideas. The Myths above are a stab in that direction. One conservative I know suggested I take the words off that chart in Myth 3 as well! He is changing his mind quite a bit these days.
I believe my answers to the Myths above, are not my opinions, but rather, facts. I am happy –truly- to be corrected. I am attempting to weave a path back to sanity if not compassion. There is a lot of unseen ammo in those myths.
We really need
To come up with ideas to use. Everyone keeps saying "but democrats don't have any good ideas, the just criticize" and I am sick of hearing it. Thats why I have been saying we need a plan of attack on issues, and get out our ideas. Keep me posted. Oh yeah, it was particuarly depressing to get shined up trickle down "vodoonomics" again no doubt.
Begin by taking these Busted
Begin by taking these Busted Myths to the street. The process counts. Conservative and Liberal folks can agree.
I will post THE AMERICAN RESTORATION ACT in Dec. Americans need to remember the simple truths shown above or they will reject every good idea. Their eyes are opening however because we’ve run the same tired “experiment” with Aristocracy: High prices and low wages for the vast majority.
Begin by taking these Busted Myths to the street. The process counts.
I will post THE AMERICAN RESTORATION ACT in Dec. Americans need to remember the simple truths show above or they will reject every good idea. Their eyes are opening however because we’ve run the same tired “experiment” with Aristocracy: High prices and low wages for the vast majority.
We don’t have to live this way. It can all change tomorrow.
Excellent job, Jim.
Thanks for all the work you put into this.
Myth 8 galls me the most. It is damn obscene
that a CEO should earn a high, seven figure salary
while his workers are barely making minimum wage.
The big business cry is, " We can't raise the minimum wage,
it will result in having to charge more for our products/services."
Bullshit! No ***s, here!
Nike pays dirt wages to workers in Asia, a few dollars for a days work.
And they charge how much for their shoes?
Who's making the huge profits?- The top tier, that's who!
PS_ I'm having big bug issues with my computer on this site,
right now. GM is trying to help me. So if my posts are weird,
please be patient. Thanks.
This prompt- 'can't connect to localhost' is jamming the works- Arggh!
Thanks Karin. You are
Thanks Karin. You are right. Apparently the CIA and the chart in Myth 3 agrees with you.
As soon as folks realize they are capable of higher incomes without changing the behavior of those at the top –with respect to the jobs they choose to do- the old America is back. Fight for more for the job you do now, just like those above you do. Don’t press it to the point of dissuading CEOs from being CEOs.
It is my opinion that CEOs and others WILL continue in their same jobs at decreased income –so that the vast majority gain increased incomes. It is my opinion that they will not, instead choose to become carpenters. Fellow Americans will have to decide for themselves if they agree with that opinion. That is how citizens will decide on THE AMERICAN RESTORATION ACT.
It can all change tomorrow…
(Must have copy and pasted twice in the post above. Yikes, I must be tired.)
I know
They say if they raise minimum wage everything will go up. What a load of crap!!!! Everything has gone up anyway, we need minimum wage to go up to keep pace.
Amen!
Amen!
Good presentation Jim...
but...but...we don't want a strong middle class--right?
I'm afraid my family’s
I'm afraid my family’s coal dust has stained me for life.
We want the Democratic Party to make it clear we fight for compensation for work, not thistledum entitlements as the Right would like to frame everything;)
As I get some feedback I will spruce up the ACT itself and present it.
Zero Compassion
I should have noted grinch, that nowhere in the prelude to The American Restoration Act do I make use of compassion or the Liberal heart. Nowhere.
I intend to prove things like, Republicans are Communists according to their own rhetoric, and advance a great deal of Democratic ideals without recourse to standard appeals.
Great job Jim. Thanks for
Great job Jim. Thanks for all of your hard work, and dedication in putting this together.
Thanks Bill.
Thanks Bill. I can’t believe it has taken me so long to work through the Right Wing landmines. The template above is helping me and I hope it can act as a bit of common ground for how we present some of the Democratic case. Some of it is meant only for the long haul. You will not convince a jerk that some people can demand more for their labor but simply do not bother to. We can however speak to that Fireman down the street, for example, and share our feelings of how many of us work for little whilst those above spit on the welfare we so provide them. This, I think, is a bit of the Democratic Party of the past.
Why did it take me so long to realize the Myth used by the Right of Winner Take All is broken by them as a matter of first principles? They don’t allow a Winner to keep making money off their patent. They vote that the patent expires so they can join in. They vote that Copyrights expire instead of going on forever. Etc. Of course I can just see them losing ground with working men and women and turning from the extreme Right Wing by claiming “hey we DON’T believe in Winner Take All!”
I may “red ink” the above template to make a “teachers version” as there is some subtle path building going on in it.
Libertarians are Communists
By the way folks, I would like to expand the number of examples on what I have found. It was like pulling teeth-from my brain getting here so any additional examples would cause spontaneous back flips!
I found, for example in Myth 1, that Republicans and Libertarians go to the voting booth like a Red horde and Take from the Winner and give to the Loser by:
-Not letting the Winner simply win everything (Anti Monopoly Laws).
-Not letting the Winner keep a lock on their inventions (Expire able Patent Laws)
-Not letting an author keep a lock on a copyright (Expire able genealogical Copyright Laws)
In other words, they need to get the F@@@ over themselves as they do nothing differant in kind than Democrats do!!!
Can anyone think of other places where the Right acts as Communists?
I showed in Myth 4, for example, a place where those of increasing Wealth were simply paying for services rendered by paying the Progressive Income Tax! I note two ways.
Can anyone think of other places where citizens are simply asked to pay for services rendered?
I may ask later, about other Myths, but the above is a start. Also, I hope to distill the template above down into a small pamphlet for dealing with the Right so any help in naming Myths or reducing paragraph sizes to their nub would be appreciated. I will give full credit where due.
I may also spruce up the graphic and print it so that it may be placed throughout America. I would lose ALL text. It would simply sit there and slowly worm its way into the consciousness of Americans. Without that, many arguments of the Right seem reasonable.
Communism vs. Neocon Capitalism
Communism, which supposedly distributes wealth and services evenly, has never achieved that lofty goal on any wide scale. The division between the "classes" does not go away with institutionalized Communism, it merely drives the aristocrats underground. The poor and under-represented citizenry remain the majority by a wide gap.
Neo-Conservative Capitalism achieves the same result, with the exception that the aristocrats do not NEED to go underground. Most of them do anyway, and attempt to hide their wealth in various tax shelters. Their visible tax burden is normally offset by tax-exempt income, which explains why the "rich tend to get richer."
Under both systems, the distribution of wealth is unevenly weighted on the side of aristocrats. Under both systems the greed factor leads to corruption and anti-social behavior on the part of aristocrats. Under both systems the poverty factor leads to anti-social behavior (usually borne by desperation) on the part of the "lower class."
So which system is better? I would vote for the Liberal interpretation of American Capitalism, which is kept in check by government regulation and oversight. American Capitalism allows for "working class" representation by Unions, and well-regulated (and fair) collective bargaining. American Capitalism fosters entrepreneurship and tradecraft. Neo-conservative Capitalism does none of these things, and despises the concept.
Well said Bill! Humans are
Well said Bill! Humans are imperfect and whatever rules we set up must take that into account. That is why I hate Communism and the FAKE Free Enterprise of modern Republicans. The policies espoused by the Right do NOT secure the very goals we strive for in Free Enterprise! That is why we must repeat those goals out loud and I have done so in Myth 10. Further, in order to tar others, they continually use rhetoric, which if applied to themselves, would brand them at Communists. It is time to call them on it and Myth 1 gets them in 3 areas that I note elsewhere.
I believe good liberal, conservative and libertarian folks, who are in genuine pursuit of knowledge do run smack into that problem of the imperfect human and do struggle with how to govern. The present Republican Party however is completely uninterested in making manifest the goals of Free Enterprise and instead are as comfortable as Aristocrats in kingdoms of old or underground Aristocrats of Communist USSR.
You have to hand it to them though, a proper title for Coulter might be:
Comrade Frau Coulter
Later Edit: I might add that all of this (including what you last paragraph points to) is now a matter of National Security. America can not sustain its world power status if we worship the whiners who continually vie for increased perks whilst neglecting the people who actually run the damned Nation. And I do not mean Politicians and “business men”.
The Good, the Bad, and The Ugly...
You are entirely correct Jim that good Americans, regardless of their political leanings, all want basically the same things for other Americans. And, for that matter, all peoples of the world.
Prior to the rise of both Communism and Neo-Conservatism, Republicans and Democrats mainly disagreed on the amount of taxes needed, and the scope of government tax-paid services. In any society there will always be tax-evading aristocrats, and welfare cheats. The role of government, and our elected representatives, is to provide the greatest good, for the greatest number (within the context of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness), while providing sufficient deterrents against abuses of the extremes.
I believe that this is what FDR tried to accomplish with the New Deal. I believe that this is what JFK meant when he said, "ask not what your country can do for you -- ask what you can do for your country."
Edit: Clarification added in itlaics for the inevitable response that this is neither a definition of Democracy, nor a Republic.
Bill, I will use your
Bill,
I will use your juxtaposition of “tax-evading Aristocrats” and “Welfare Cheats”. That says a lot!
I was just thinking about the Kennedy Quote! I am working on a simple logo for The American Restoration Act and bracketed between the extremes is a portion where soldiers give back by offering their lives.
I think the tipping point comes when people start to view the vast majority realistically. Namely that nothing happens without them, despite the mythos created around some of those at the top. Some there are of course, great Americans. Some are whiny little twerps capable of being unseated as soon as everyone sees the emperor has no clothes.
Jim
Could you
compile a chart like #3 showing who pays the bulk of the taxes in America, Jim? I am thinking of the tax structure in the 50's where corperations paid a large percent and the individual paid proportionately much less than than today, if that is true.
Thanks so much for all the work that has gone into this project. I hope to soon see this as a pamphlet in every local democrat committee office in the country. You have done a great job. Just a look at the wealth chart will explain what words will not be able to get through to the average voter.
Proud member of the reality based community.
Di
Di,
This site seems to be a pretty good spot for graphics on your question:
http://www.askquestions.org/articles/taxes/#01
As I noted, I am concentrating on the end results of all the blather one hears because I see a need for sound bites – or at least close to it.
Further, all the arguments I’ve heard stem from the holy writ of high salaries, or the evil there in. From the extreme Right and the extreme Left. I am simply arguing for Americans to get back in the mix of Free Enterprise and recognize that the goals of Free Enterprise are clearly being foiled. At least if one believes, as I do, that there are a great number of wage earners who would do exactly the same job at lower pay. Which in turn would mean higher pay for others. (And again this does not address innovation and increased efficiencies.)
American’s have been hypnotized in a specific way. To complain about wages or the high wages of others is to invite the invective of “Communist”. I’m sorry but Myth 7 makes it clear that the other guy is rich because those that he needed to gain his wealth were too wimpy to demand more for their labor. Of late all we have been treated to is the Commy bullshit. Well right back at um –WIMP!
Jim
That is a really informative
That is a really informative link, Jim, thanks.
If only there were a short clear way to bumpersticker this, it would be a start to get the working and voting public talking and thinking about where their hard earned money is going and why :
Finance is a very dry and complicated subject, but I think it is too important to the welfare of all families to just let it go in the '06 elections. If mortgage companies and credit card companies can find ways to simplify finance the democrats should be able to make some of the most important facts public and get the discussion started with the same people.
Proud member of the reality based community.
Breaking the hypnotic state
Breaking the hypnotic state is the rub.
I tried the Myths above on a conservative and non voter and their eyes opened quite a bit. The key, I think, is to get people to realize two things: 1) It is okay to demand more for one’s labor and there is a good and sacred way to do that: Americana. 2) The earth will not explode if those who are asking you to help them make money are stuck with a crowd that says: fine but we want a bigger cut.
I think if you re-read the myths you will see that they are conservative friendly. Not hypnotic-conservative-state friendly mind you, but conservative friendly.
The Act itself is, as the Myths are above: Very straightforward. It is a few sentences long but it agrees with conservative and liberal views. What is taking my time now is proving that they are revenue neutral. Before the populace would be willing to accept it however I felt a course needed to be laid which both liberal and conservative, north and south, could accept and so I began with the Myths.
By the way, the ACT does NOT jive with Aristocratic views so the battle will be with the present Republican leadership and possibly our own.
Thankyou Di.
Thankyou Di.
Words abound and I am trying to decrease their numbers. Charts abound, but they lead people away from the BOTTOM LINE: Most people own nuttin. Further, I noticed that all the arguments advanced by the Right and defended by the Left speak about income after it has been acquired. It is then wrapped in a rhetorical box that is NOT to be penetrated even by compassion for those with less. I wish to discuss instead the PROCESS (hence all the Myths) because liberal and conservative folks understand that, and can reach agreement on it without an appeal to compassion.
I should add
I should add:
After all the taxes are paid, the result is the chart in Myth 3. In other words, somebody sure is making sure they get their due regardless of how much tax is paid. Further, since wages are a zero sum game -except for invention- others are, in the final analysis, getting nuttin but paycheck to paycheck living.
If one were a pessimist one would say that the taxes are allowed for and taken out of employees hides so as to produce the enormous wealth difference.
I guess, if a genie were to
I guess, if a genie were to give me one and only one wish for the country (and this is a really hard one when considering all the inequities) it would be that every citizen have a clear and easily understandable look at where the playing field has been intentionally tipped in favor of the very few, [very large corporations and the already stinking rich] at our extreme expense.
This is what I think the average Joe needs to understand:
I am afraid that our "Joe" thinks that he too is getting a tax break (just like he thought that the "death tax" applied to him) and he doesn't seem to understand that his government is putting 10 cents in his left pocket and taking a dollar out of his right. Less in federal taxes paid, less moneys coming to the states and local communities. It is a kind of pay me now or pay me later with interest, but it is Joe who will end up paying the lion's share in the end.
The violet people on your chart can easily afford to live in gated and guarded enclaves where police, fire and ambulances arrive in minutes, if needed. They not only have the best medical ins. but can afford any and all extras that may not be covered. They don't have to worry about infrastructure, at least until things get really bad, they can create their own, for the most part.
It is the orange and the green people who have to worry about these things happening to them, along with the pot holes on their way to work damaging the family car and the falling quality of their kid's public school education and the cuts in services to the community.
If only there were some way to make EVERYONE in the country see that just because something is good for corporate interests does NOT mean it is good for the American people! Corporations should give back to the community/country proportionately to the benifit they recieve from it.
What helps those on the lower end of the economic and educational scale enriches the entire community. Our great great grandparents knew that. They made public education a top priority in every town in America, so that all children would have a chance at some education, because they knew it was good for the nation. They built public libraries so that all could read, not just the wealthy, because they knew it enriched the entire community to have educated citizens. They knew what we have forgotten...that the strenth of our nation is in her people. I don't know about anyone else's ancestors, but mine are shocked and angry that we would let corporations be made people and people be made slaves to them.
Proud member of the reality based community.
So true Di.
So true Di. I am positing that the way to break through is to make sure the each of the tiny little bullet points (Myths above) be re-introduced back into the American Psyche as it was when our parents and grandparents knew human nature:
Bums do abound. The poor ones don’t have your money. They don’t have any money. They are Poor!
Americans of liberal and conservative nature need to recognize anew what the goals of Free Enterprise are. They need to see it as the two edged sword that it is. Some times an entrepreneur is what the old timers called a swindler. Sometimes a silver tongue can net one more cash, for zero additional labor. Maybe soon, Americans will say:
Ya know what, I think, for example, that CEOs will do the exact job they are doing now for less pay. Freeing up capitol for others.
In my opinion, ensuring that someone can buy a new $100,000 car every day and then have it junked at the end of the day because it is used, will not motivate that human being any further than if he was forced to drive the same $100,000 car for one month and then throw it away. There is a point of diminishing returns with stratospheric salaries. Since capitol is then NOT available to the vast majority this also cuts off some would be economic engines.
Demanding more for the labor you are doing NOW is what Americans believed in, in the past. Many of those at the top live by that. What is espoused for the rest is Myth 9: Get an education. Don’t ask for more. Get a second job. The pathetic thing is men in the Republican Party take this as a badge of honor when their employer is laughing all the way to the back.
Jim, I will be happy to comment on this.
In college, I was a business management major. Today I am a loan officer for a one of the largest banking institutions in the world. Every day when I talk to people I see the growing gap between the rich and the poor. I am getting tired of seeing all of the CEO's who get promoted, get large bonuses, corrupt the company and watch it fall. To be rewarded for the hard efforts, they get let go and recieve a large sum of money to take care of them for the rest of their lives... CEO's should only get paid based on the production and success of their company.. Many times when I do loans I see how the rich take avantage of the tax system. They write everything off on their taxes and claim hardly anything. They are able to do this because they have a high paid CPA doing... You are absolutely corrent about "Everyone having the same chance." That is a complete Myth. I know I am just going on and on and I will respond more once I collect my thoughts.
You are pointing out the
You are pointing out the main “rub” in all this:
Americans, via modern Republicanism, came to the conclusion that if someone COULD get more cash for themselves, then that person was fulfilling the two goals of Free Enterprise and every other American needed to shut up as this is not a Communist country.
Well this ain’t no Aristocracy either, so forgive those have the balls to call a scheming twerp: a scheming twerp.
Demanding more for ones labor takes cash out of another guys pocket. EVERYONE NEEDS TO DO THAT NOT JUST THOSE AT THE TOP. Just don’t do it by breaking one of the goals of Free Enterprise. The first step however is just realizing slime bags exist. I think that realization is starting to occur. There is a way out. More later…
Great Website
The Median Family Income of $40,000/year equals a stack of hundred dollar bills about one and a half inches high. The highest wage earners get a stack of hundred dollar bills higher than Mount Everest!
There is a great site with graphics at: http://www.lcurve.org/
My suspicion is that they would continue to do what they are doing even if the majority asked for a raise. They make nothing without help.
Help
Help
Two of the three main proposals of The American Restoration Act are coming along fine. (Okay, if I have to continue to wade through census bureau spreadsheets I may lose it but….). I have the reasoning, rhetoric, and revenue neutral beginnings of those two and am just working out the details.
The above two however reduced my third offering overwhelmingly. Question: can someone either give me their input on Health Care or point out the finances of such in a new way? If not, I never have much luck searching the blog for items. Were there a few good threads in the past on Health Care?
THANKS!!!
Jim
Here is a link to a New
Here is a link to a New Yorker article that has a good analysis on the history of attempts at health care reform in the US: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050829fa_fact
My take on the issue is, that it is a very Conservative position to provide for universal health care: because, it increases the amount of time trained workers are available for full-time production, and reduces the need for "sick pay" benefits. IOW, there is a positive, and measurable return-on-investment...;-)
The pinko, lefty, Liberal in me however, says that universal health care is a part of the social contract we have with each other as American citizens. We jointly declared our independence from the King of England in order to enjoy life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I believe that includes the pursuit of good health, and the prevention of suffering.
Thanks Bill.
Thanks Bill.
I will study the article. I hear ya as well. I was working along the lines of your second paragraph because the spirit of what I am doing has to do with re-centering the debate on sanity whilst leaving the fleshing out for those with hearts or dried apple cores as hearts ;)
I have some tidbits on this which I may offer within the ACT, but I am not sure yet. I am inundated with work right now so I have to concentrate on the other two points of the ACT.
Jim
Bill,You might find this
Bill,
You might find this site useful:
http://www.citizenshealthcare.gov/healthreport/invitation.php
Present cost of Health Care in America is ~$6500 per person.
Jim
As opposed to around
As opposed to around $3000/person in most other industrialized Western nations.
I guess it helps to stop
I guess it helps to stop dickering about with paper work.
Prevention Magazine just had
Prevention Magazine just had a nice piece on this. It said the U.S. cost was about $7,800 per person. England ran in at $2,800. Guess it shows you what corporate America gets you - screwed.
"They want the federal government controlling Social Security
like it's some kind of federal program."
- George W. Bush in a debate in St. Charles, Mo., Nov. 2, 2000
Thanks googa1. I would love
Thanks googa1. I would love to follow the money trail better! I think I will wrap up the work on the two other proposals, publish them, and move to that work. If the vast majority is ready to do better maybe this time they’ll give themselves a “yea” and vote for it.
WAGES
Median U.S. income: $43,000 a year.
Top .01% income: $17 million a year.
There is no way to graph income on a simple linear plot. Your eyes can not see what the average worker makes if you wish to keep the above, high end income, in the same picture. (At least within the limited space of a blog. photo.)
Hope to publish the beginning of the ACT within a week.
Wage Gap
http://www.wilcoxinvest.com/longterm/inequality.htm
From the How To Get Rich Myth and the above chart I would say that 90% of us work too cheaply getting other people rich OR pay too much for goods and services. (I am leaving out innovation because of late, no matter how much more productive the American worker gets, it seems he is taken for granted.)
No need for a pat on the back that I am a “rugged individualist” who may some day be a millionaire. I’ll take my cash up front like the millionaires do. In fact that is how you get rich: Convince others not to balk while you're taking your cash up front.
Make no mistake, there is nothing wrong with trying to get paid more. I just think everybody should do it!
I should also note that there is nothing wrong with some making a lot more than others. I simply claim that when the previous generation fought over wages, the disparity between wages diminished because those above STILL wanted to proceed with their money making schemes.
.
Partial Publication of the ACT soon…
...Restoring America to a time when courage and work paid...
Jim
If you can listen to the hearings going on NOW on C-SPAN 2
Harry Alford is testifying now about many of the things that we have talked about in this thread.
Proud member of the reality based community.
Thanks Di
Thanks Di,
I will TRY to get past my 2 year old. ELMO IS ON!!!
Wish me luck.
Jim
hahahaha
Maybe you can catch it later on the web site ;)
Proud member of the reality based community.
Liberalsim
Di,
I’ll try and catch it there.
Obviously, from the way I am writing, I believe we must center the debate on compensation for work. This rids us of quite a few obstacles. Fleshing such an approach out due to yearnings of the Liberal, or Traditional Christian Heart, is then far more likely as well. ---Well, at least there is a much shorter distance to traverse.
As Necco recently put it: “because it’s the right thing to do” does, in my book, cover the fleshing out process. I have found it difficult however to get through to people without dividing the process into two parts. Further division led to the Myth structure presented here.
American Liberalism seats itself midway between Communism and Monarchy. It is, I believe, the place where the vast majority of Americans fully sit, both philosophically and practically. The problem has been, in my view, to turn gut feelings into hypnotism/instigator proof retorts.
Jim
GEEEEEEEEEZZ
"Our economic policies have done the trick," said Rep. Deborah Pryce (R-Ohio). "We are in the middle of one of the strongest economies this country has ever seen."
But some budget analysts say the flourish of tax cutting badly undermines the recent shows of fiscal discipline. Last month's budget-cutting bill would save $50 billion over five years by imposing new fees on Medicaid recipients, trimming the food stamp rolls, squeezing student lenders and cutting federal child support enforcement.
"I don't think it makes any sense to go through all the difficulty they just went through with the budget-cutting bill, then give it all back in tax cuts," said Robert L. Bixby, executive director of the Concord Coalition, a nonpartisan budget watchdog group. "If they want to cut taxes, fine, but they are going to have to cut spending by at least that much to help the deficit, and clearly they are not willing to do that. They have to start looking reality in the face."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/07/AR200512...?
Proud member of the reality based community.
Who gives a rat’s ass
Who gives a rat’s ass if Republicans cut taxes 100%!!!!
They are borrowing the money and the bottom 80%-90% are going to have to pay it back!!!!!!!!!
They are simply waiting until we have all forgotten that Democrats filled the treasury. They will simply tell us all it is time to tighten out belts. This, after milking the vast majority on inflated energy prices.
That reminds me: Who cares if energy prices come down? They fleeced Americans so they are happy to lower prices a tad.
MY POINT
They are taking the money from badly needed programs for the working poor and the middle class. It is coming out of Medicaid, student loans and food stamps!
They are going to keep wacking away at programs for real people to give tax cuts to the uberrich!
Proud member of the reality based community.
Exactly! But Republicans
Exactly!
But Republicans have poked those who don’t have a pot to piss in, long enough, that they take it out on those too dehydrated to piss!
Bottom line: Even if you hate the poor YOU are in the crosshairs of this Republican Party if you aren’t in the top 10%.
On the other hand, ain’t that: karma, what goes around comes around, ye shall reap what thou sow, etc.
I agree, but...
Dinamic and Jim:
I absolutely agree. But, there are a lot of people that "claim" to be republicans that are in that other 90% that truly do not understand (ignorance or bury their heads in the sand) that this adminstration has NOTHING to do with being a republican.
As we all know, Bush is a despot criminal that has highjacked a political party and a religion for his own perverted greed and power.
Question is, How do we get all these pseudo-republicans to understand they are being fleeced and raped just as much as everyone else by this thug Bush?
Ps. I know a lot of people that fall WAY short of that top 10% bracket that you mention and yet they still blindly follow Bush and heed his every lying word!
I am really getting frustrated...
"The first casualty when war comes is truth."
It is now, sadly, a decades
It is now, sadly, a decades long project.
I have seen the bullshit creep into academia and so I offer a bit of a logical path here.
I should also note that when Democrats offer the middle class Republican Lite alternatives, it is just not enough to break through the fog of “screw the poor, for they have our money”.
I hope to offer something grander for us to at least talk about. With that, and a new recognition that someone is a putz for not demanding more for their labor, NOT a communist FOR demanding more, we can begin the slow march back to sanity.