"Duke" Cunningham accused of accepting a bribe

Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, R-Escondido managed to sell his house to a defense contractor for $1,675,000 in November 2003.

The defense contractor then put it back on the market almost immediately for roughly the same price. But the Del Mar house languished unsold and vacant for 261 days before selling for $975,000. At the same time, the congressman, a member of the influential defense appropriations subcommittee, was supporting the contractor's efforts to get tens of millions of dollars in contracts from the Pentagon.

So when literally everyone in San Diego was making money on their house appreciation, Cunninghams buyers managed to lose $700,000.

From the San Diego Union Tribune yesterday:
Meanwhile, Cunningham used the proceeds of the $1,675,000 sale to buy a $2.55 million house in Rancho Santa Fe. And Wade, who had been suffering through a flat period in winning Pentagon contracts, was on a tear – reeling in tens of millions of dollars in defense and intelligence-related contracts.

In an interview Wednesday, Cunningham conceded that the circumstances surrounding the transaction could raise "fair" questions, but he insisted that the real estate deal was legitimate and independent of his efforts to help Wade win contracts.

"My whole life I've lived aboveboard," Cunningham said. "I've never even smoked a marijuana cigarette. I don't cheat. If a contractor buys me lunch and we meet a second time, I buy the lunch. My whole life has been aboveboard and so this doesn't worry me."
-----------------------------
I've heard the "defense contractors" work is classified, so we don't know what the $700K bought them. Also, it appears the house was never listed in the MLS listing and the transaction was done with cash to avoid a document/loan trail. Some defense.

Welcome to democrats.com.

Please offer attribution (a link) to the news source.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Partisanship in the 'news'.too obvious?

Why don't we hear about this on the so-called "media"? Instead they report on Democrats with their bad luck and demonize us. They never touch a repug unless it is to lie for them. Michael Jackson is a Democrat; Terri Schiavo and her husband were, are, Democrats, Martha Stewart, seems they just want to discredit the Dems., evidently, this credits the repugs ....? I don't know if it's just me or if that, indeed, is the case. It just seems to be the way it is. It's always the Democrats that make the news and usually twisted out of proporation. Of course, the repugs are fantastic, they're just barely skimmed over, if at all touched. Is it me?

Sharon, The LA Times

finally published the DSM, today.
http://www.democrats.com/node/5017

Did everyone miss that?
( except for a few people)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.