Bush Logic: "Protect Unborn" Children, Test Pesticides On Born Ones

Wow! Bush's EPA decides that children outside the womb shouldn't be used for pesticide experiments!

EPA Cancels Proposed Study That Would Have Exposed Children To Pesticides

(AP) - The Environmental Protection Agency on Friday canceled a controversial study using children to measure the effect of pesticides after Democrats said they would block Senate confirmation of the agency's new head.

Stephen Johnson, as EPA's acting administrator, ordered an end to the planned study, a reversal from the agency's position just a day earlier when it said it would await the advice of outside scientific experts.

The aim of the study, Johnson said, was to fill data gaps on children's exposure to household pesticides and chemicals. He suspended it last November after ethical questions were raised by scientists within EPA and by environmentalists.

[...]

Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., had joined with Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., in demanding the study's cancellation as a condition for confirming Johnson's nomination by President Bush.

"I am very pleased that Mr. Johnson has recognized the gross error in judgment the EPA made when they concocted this immoral program to test pesticides on children," Boxer said.

"The CHEERS program was a reprehensible idea that never should have made it out of the boardroom, and I am just happy that it was stopped before any children were put in harm's way," Boxer said, adding that she would continue to oppose any testing of toxins on humans.

Environmentalists such as Mike Casey, a spokesman for the advocacy- and research-oriented Environmental Working Group, applauded the end of what he called "a completely corrupt idea."

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

No hypocrisy, just good business.

Of COURSE you have to protect unborn children. How the hell else are you going to get test subjects? Don't you understand how democracy works? It's government of the people, by the people, for the people...the oil people, the big business people, the outsourcing people...

There they are, playing God a

There they are, playing God again. If God had wanted to protect those children from pesticides, he would have had them born where there weren't any.

Where's Randall Terry when you need him?

"Every Sperm Is Precious"

Reminds me of the "Every Sperm Is Precious" musical number at the beginning of "Monty Python's Meaning of Life."

The Catholic father refuses to wear condoms in the name of his religion. So his house is basically packed with hundreds of kids. He gives this speech all about the virtues of not wearing condoms. It turns into the song, "Every Sperm Is Precious."

After the song he says -- well since I can't afford all of ya, I'm sending you away to be used for medical experiments...

Just one tiny mint? It's waf

Just one tiny mint? It's wafer thin... Get me a bucket!

God, I love that movie.

"A Modest Proposal"

It's not an accident that the full title of Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal" is "A Modest Proposal For Preventing The Children Of Poor People In Ireland From Being A Burden To Their Parents".

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.