LOL!
Gave me a laugh man...

Then whats with the machine in florida that was maxed over its limit with kerry votes? Theres yer fraud, exhibit A.

Second, yah, im gonna make you even sicker, bush DID get mor evotes than any other in history, with 284 electoral, and more popular votes than any in US history, also, consider that the population has risen, one key factor to explai that.

Third, Kerry was NEVER a president, and as far as im concerned, never will be unless the Democrats think they will run him again, then its a toss up because im not sure who the republicans will have, so i really cant speak for what hasnt happend yet. That being said, stop referring to him as one. And no he didnt, because bush beat him by popular, and bush allready gotmore than any in hostory;)

You dispute and argue with yourself in your entire post there.

There WAS NO Voter fruad on the Bush part, there were Poll/election watchers which would become evidence immeadietly should any lawsuit be launched, and it was overseen by the US Supreme Court that the Republicans had the right to insert poll watchers.

I posted this and created a spreadsheet of past election results
for everyone's information:

http://blog.democrats.com/trackback/152

Buash also recevied the largest number of votes against him than any other President or Presidential condidate in history. As for the perons who claims Bush has received more votes than any in history that fact is irrlelvant becasue its percentage that matters not the total votes. In terms of percentages, Bush has received a smaller percentage lead than any President before except his own record in 2000. Finally this person who claims to "know" that there was no vote fraud is a typical ostrich Republican who does KNOW anything about vote fraud but just cannot accpet that his or her candidate might have been elected by fraud and is too afraid or lazy to do the research to find out but instead wants to call everyone else a liar.

Keep the good points coming!

Jeff