Rescind Bush's May 9th Directive

Democrats:

Impeachment should be pushed to the back burner.  It is NOT our most critical priority.

First, recognize political reality: Impeachment of Bush and/or Cheney is NOT going to happen. If one or the other is impeached, the Senate will not confirm it. If the Senate did, it would only bring a replacement every bit as horrid as the incumbent, but with an advantage going into the 2008 elections - provided they will even occur.

Second, and more importantly, if impeachment was voted on by the House, what is to prevent Der Fuhrer Dub-yah from simply dissolving Congress, suspending Constitutional law and elections, and calling for round-up of all dissenters into Halliburton-built detention camps via his assumption of total command as provided through a self-declared emergency state of affairs under quasi-legal powers he imposed in his May 9th Executive directive / Homeland Security directive?

Wake up, folks!  He doesn't even have to declare martial law!  He HAS the power.

Democrats have put the impeachment cart ahead of the donkey braying the need to rescind Bush's May 9th directive that nullifies the 1976 National Emergency Management Act and replaces it with his arbitrary, unilateral, absolute assumption of power in a self-declared state of emergency. 

Everyone is so busy building steam behind an impeachment effort that will invariably go bust, when the real danger is that he has conferred upon himself dictatorial powers he can use at will - and no one is doing a damned thing about it!

Priorities, people!  Remove the GREATEST danger to consititutional law first - then move on to impeachment, confident that the bastard can't simply suspend the process.

I'm not saying it WILL happen, but that we should do all we can to prevent the possibility.

If not - advantage, Bush.

- Will

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

not impeachment

Once a snowball like impeachment begins it is the end of the end for these posers. Revolution is in order in such cases as you are suggesting and rightly so. There are many patriots in this land and you are mistaken to think that they can harness powers of citizens who will not participate without revolt in such plans as you envision. I prefer to envision a rejection of Bush by Capital as he is an unstable ally. They will now align with a Democratic President who they will influence, as they have the Republican one.

 

 

All for Impeachment - AFTER Bush's power is removed

Hairgod: (Love the pseudonym),

 I'm all for impeachment.  And the revolutionary spirit lives, but we have a situation where "King" George has conferred upon himself absolute power.  Should impeachment roll into an avalanche against Bush, there is nothing to prevent an "emergency" situation in which he simply suspends elections and constitutional liberties, dissolves Congress, and order the tanks to roll.

Unless we DEMAND of Congress and the Judiciary nullification of Bush's May 9th directive as an unconstitutional usurpation of power in violation of the 1976 National Emergency Management Act (that provides for Congressional review of presidential actions during times of national emergency), we risk Bush's retention of office, power, and likely, invasion of Iran.

This regime will stop at nothing to fulfill its agenda.  There is only "We, the People" between freedom and absolute tyranny.

Kindest regards,

Will 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.