Does Huckabee Understand the Threat of Avian Flu Mutation?

Everyone knows Mike Huckabee doesn't believe in evolution:

after evolution came up in a debate earlier this year, Huckabee said in a conference call with reporters, "If you want to believe that you and your family came from apes, that's fine. I'll accept that. I just don't happen to think that I did." 

Watch him avoid the question during a CNN debate: 

But does that mean Huckabee can't get elected President? Of course not - millions of voters also don't believe in evolution, so Huckabee could easily become President despite his willful ignorance.

There's a famous story about a man who approached Adlai Stevenson during one of his losing campaigns against Dwight Eisenhower. The man declared, "Governor Stevenson, you have the vote of every thinking person!" To which Stevenson replied, "Thanks, but I need a majority."

Huckabee's hostility to evolution isn't just a personal view; as Governor, he supported it as government educational policy:

During Huckabee’s tenure as Governor, evolution education in Arkansas languished in an environment of general hostility and insufficiency. Two anti-evolution bills were introduced in the state’s House of Representatives; textbooks in the Beebe, Arkansas public high school carried disclaimer stickers denigrating evolution; the state’s science curriculum earned a grade of “D” overall and an abysmal “zero” for its treatment of evolution; a creationist “museum” enjoyed state-funded advertising; and evolution was systematically and broadly squeezed out of schools and other educational institutions across the state. Huckabee did nothing to deter any of this – in fact, some of his public statements might indicate his tacit support.

But apart from promoting ignorance, why should Americans care if Huckabee denies evolution?

Simple: because the lives of millions of Americans might depend on it.

One of the most serious potential health threats we face is the mutation of the H5N1 virus that is epidemic among birds ("avian flu") into a form that can be spread among humans.

That mutation hasn't happened yet that we know of, but a number of humans have caught and died from the virus, and scientists believe a human-to-human mutation is a serious possibility. Since no humans have acquired immunity to H5N1, the impact of such a mutation could rival the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918, which killed 50-100 million people worldwide.

If an H2H mutation appeared, it could take years to create, mass-produce, and distribute a vaccine. The key to saving millions of lives is understanding the threat, preparing for it, and responding immediately.

But if President Huckabee doesn't believe in evolution, how can he possibly understand that H5N1 could mutate and threaten the lives of tens of millions? And if he doesn't understand, how can he be prepared to deal with it if it happens while he's President?

This is not a hypothetical question. Ronald Reagan refused to deal with the emergence of AIDS during his Presidency because he was ideologically (and politically) hostile to homosexuality. He wouldn't even say the word "AIDS"

until the illness of movie star and national icon Rock Hudson became public news in July 1985. By that time, over 10,000 Americans had been diagnosed with AIDS, and over 6,000 had died. 

Similarly, South African President Thabo Mbeki let millions die because he refused to believe the HIV virus caused AIDS.

So here's a question journalists should ask Huckabee:

If you do not believe in evolution, do you believe the H5N1 virus could mutate and threaten a deadly global pandemic like the Spanish Flu of 1918?

Tens of millions of lives could depend on Huckabee's answer.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

American views on religon and politics have endured DEvolution

I took a moment to re-read one of JFKs great speeches. I'll share an excerpt.

"I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute--where no Catholic prelate would tell the President (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishoners for whom to vote--where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference--and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the President who might appoint him or the people who might elect him.

I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish--where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source--where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials--and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all.

For while this year it may be a Catholic against whom the finger of suspicion is pointed, in other years it has been, and may someday be again, a Jew--or a Quaker--or a Unitarian--or a Baptist. It was Virginia's harassment of Baptist preachers, for example, that helped lead to Jefferson's statute of religious freedom. Today I may be the victim- -but tomorrow it may be you--until the whole fabric of our harmonious society is ripped at a time of great national peril.

Finally, I believe in an America where religious intolerance will someday end--where all men and all churches are treated as equal--where every man has the same right to attend or not attend the church of his choice--where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting of any kind--and where Catholics, Protestants and Jews, at both the lay and pastoral level, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain and division which have so often marred their works in the past, and promote instead the American ideal of brotherhood."

(text of the complete speech, which resonates in today's world, can be found at http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/S...)

Contrast these words with the words of Mike Huckabee:

"Government knows it does not have the answer, but it's arrogant and acts as though it does," Huckabee said. "Church does have the answer but will cowardly deny that it does and wonder when the world will be changed....I fear we will turn and hit the snooze button one more time and lose this great republic of ours...I'm often asked why taxes are so high and government is so big. It's because the faith we have in local churches has become so small. If we'd been doing what we should have -- giving a dime from every dollar to help the widows, the orphans and the poor -- we now wouldn't be giving nearly 50 cents of every dollar to a government that's doing ... what we should have been doing all along...I didn't get into politics because I thought government had a better answer. I got into politics because I knew government didn't have the real answers, that the real answers lie in accepting Jesus Christ into our lives."

(Source: http://www2.arkansasonline.com/news/1998/jun/08/huckabee-us-gave-religio...)

So there you have it. Democrats, believing that a just government can and should serve the common good of all, and Republicans, believing that government can do no right, and that only Christian churches have the answers.

.. or maybe I'm reading it wrong?

Rummy Is Smiling

As he stands to "earn" millions from the patented cure for avian flu.

David Swanson
david@davidswanson.org
http://www.davidswanson.org

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.