Elect Barack Obama
Impeach Bush & Cheney!
"Google" your Voter Registration
Register to Vote
Vote Early-Absentee-Nov4
Visit the Democratic Party
User loginNavigation![]() "The 35 Articles of Impeachment and the Case for Prosecuting George W. Bush" is available for $12; a free downloadable PDF is also available. |
110th Congress Buys the War
Iraq War veterans also spoke, taking a break from Operation First Casualty, which had them in uniform “patrolling and occupying” the streets of D.C. and Capitol Hill (Photos are available here). After the press conference, the veterans went deep into enemy territory i.e. the White House, and several dozen military family members and supporters went to Congresswoman Pelosi’s office to pepper the staff with questions, and make another seemingly futile request for a meeting with the Speaker. Military family members spent several hours canvassing Congressional offices with the Certificates, appealing to Representatives to stop the supplemental and end the war. I was back on the Hill on Thursday for a Senate Armed Services committee meeting, followed by stops at several Senatorial offices. First was Sen. Akaka (D-Hawaii), to ask about my request for the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee to hold a human cost hearing. Bad timing, no one was around to help me, will call next week, and go back. Next stop: the Senate VA committee office in the Russell building. I cc’d them on the hearing request, and asked if there’d been any movement. The snarky staffer kept saying that they’d never gotten my e-mail, knew nothing about my request, but I refused to leave and, after some pressing, they whipped out the hard copy of my letter. Then the man with the bad attitude metaphorically patted me on the head, saying, “We have hearings all the time, and get expert testimony.” I reply, “You mean like the expert testimony General Pace provided at an Armed Services hearing in early February when he assured the Chair of the Homeland Security Committee that he was fully confident in the readiness and capabilities of the National Guard, particularly in the border states? And then, two weeks later, Lt. Gen. Blum of the National Guard reported that only 12 percent of Guard units were at readiness?” That kind of expert testimony?” The man sneers, but remains silent. “The only people who are experts at the realities and challenges and failure to care for veterans are the veterans themselves and the military families who love them. We need an open hearing.” I repeated that to Jeff Bjornstad, chief of staff of Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), who is a member of the Veterans Affairs committee. Jeff and I talked about a number of things, and I hope to have some progress to report in the next week or so. Back to the vote. Our people spent much of the day Thursday making phone calls and in meetings with members of Congress, their staffers or aides. It wasn’t looking good, but we knew it was over when the Out of Iraq - whoops, scratch that - the Stay in Iraq Caucus released it’s members to vote ‘yes’ on continuing the funding for the war. Some examples: Rep. Wynn (D-Maryland) has made a public commitment to defunding the war. Last month, Congressman Wynn signed onto the Declaration of Peace and publicly committed to defund the war, withdraw US troops, and support a sustained peace process and the reconstruction of Iraq. As part of this, he signed on to Jim McGovern's bill, HR 4232, End the War in Iraq Act, to use the Congressional power of the purse to get our troops out of Iraq starting now. Just a few weeks ago, Rep. Wynn was the only member of the Maryland delegation who said he would not vote for continued funding of this war. Yesterday, he voted for the war. Even more unbelievable is Congressman Jim McGovern (D-MA), who introduced HR 4232, and has spent years publicly proclaiming his opposition to the war. Yesterday, he voted for the war. The bill does have a timeline, one that brings troops home at the end of 2008, unless they are engaged in training Iraq forces or killing or capturing terrorists. Which means this goes on for another year and a half, and there’s no real timeline at all. Another year and a half where we will see an average of three soldiers dying every day. The bill does place restrictions on the president, and includes a loop hole that lets the president send the troops to Iraq, ill-equipped, ill-trained, and without proper rest, as long as he tells Congress in writing why it's in the interest of national security to do so. Earlier this year, Congressman Markey (D-MA) signed a pledge to vote against the $100 billion supplemental appropriation for Iraq coming before Congress. Representative Markey has stated he would vote against all supplemental funding. Yesterday, he voted for the war. Who else failed miserably in the integrity department and bought the war yesterday, after getting elected largely because of their opposition to funding it? Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH), whose campaign website states: "The United States must physically leave, abandon our "lone wolf" approach, and work with other nations to stabilize Iraq. Americans have spent billions on this unnecessary war only to see tragedy, fraud, and waste." I guess Carol thought we should spend another 100 billion more, so that America could add to the tragedy, fraud, and waste while Keith Ellison (D-MN) who ran on an anti-war ticket, and posted this on his website: "I am calling for an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. I opposed the war before it began; I was against this war once it started and I am the only candidate calling for an immediate withdrawal of troops." Now that Keith’s not a candidate, his true colors come out, and he’s decided that rather than supporting the troops, he supports some sort of withdrawal at some point in the distant future – or not. Campaign’s over, folks, back to business as usual. Other disappointments include: Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), another outspoken war critic, Of the 14 Dem’s who did NOT vote to fund the war, New York Congressman McNulty’s website statement is particularly noteworthy: "In the spring of 1970, during my first term as Town Supervisor of Green Island, I testified against the War in Vietnam at a Congressional Field Hearing in Schenectady, New York. Several months after that testimony, my brother, HM3 William F. McNulty, a Navy Medic, was killed in Quang Nam Province. Yesterday, every member of Congress that voted to fund the war bought – at minimum – another year and a half of pain, sacrifice, and suffering, which will be paid for by thousands of American troops and military families, and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. note: CP here, I took the liberty of converting the original pdf files of the Certificate of Ownership to jpg form. The certificate is embedded above and below is the reverse, warranty. You can d-load the original pdf's for printing at mfso.org or directly here and here...
|
What's HotStop Bush from Pardoning Himself
Replace Bush Democrats
Escrow to Keep Obama Progressive Local: connect with Democrats.com members in your State, County, and Congressional District Are you really registered to vote? "Google" your voter registration to find out Ten Reasons to Impeach Bush & CheneyParis Says: No Pardons!Out of Iraq PetitionForumsPollShould Congress Give Paulson $700 Billion Blank Check? Yes 1% No 99% Total votes: 146 Protest and Organize! |
The person who owns this war is George W. Bush.
The person who owns this war is George W. Bush. The way I understand the recent legislation, it gives 100% ownership of the war to the Misleader-In-Chief. The House did ok the additional funds BUT also set a firm withdrawl date. Not to mention the withdrawl date is at the end of the Bush era (aka error) so the war ends with the moron who started it. Since so much "progress" is going on in Iraq according to Bush and Cheney, then by fall 2008 we should be gone.
There is a very interesting catch in the legislation that I don't think most have thought about yet. Bush's "winning is staying, leaving is losing" Iraq plan has put him in an interesting spot. Since he doesn't like timetables, he can veto this legislation. If he vetoes the legislation, he doesn't get one more penny from Congress to sustain his war. I've heard that the Pentagon will run out of funds in 3 weeks.
So what would you do if you were W? He doesn't want the Democrats to tell him to withdraw but he needs funds to continue action in Iraq. Do you think he will accept the legislation? Do you think he will bring the troops home now? Do you think he will be stealing funds from elsewhere to continue his war? And $100+ Billion is a lot to scrape out of federal budget - especially since Republicans shrunk to the size so that he can drown in bathtub (aka New Orleans).
"They want the federal government controlling Social Security
like it's some kind of federal program."
- George W. Bush in a debate in St. Charles, Mo., Nov. 2, 2000
stoping the iraq war
we all know that the only way to end the iraq war is to cut off the funds.I realy dont see how people dont understand that when you vote for more funding you vote for the war.theres no end date certain in the funding bill,anybody who says otherwise is a lier.read the bill if you dont beleive me.theres more holes in this bill then you can count.
I am going by Bush's own
I am going by Bush's own words . . .
Radio Address
I love no conditions, without restriction and without pork (guess the Iraq war isn't pork). Sorry to tell Bush but his Republican gang isn't in control anymore. Bush is going to veto the bill meaning NO MONEY FOR WAR! And then who will Americans really blame for putting the troops in danger?
"They want the federal government controlling Social Security
like it's some kind of federal program."
- George W. Bush in a debate in St. Charles, Mo., Nov. 2, 2000
it'll be interesting if Smirk does veto
but first it needs to go through the Senate and the conference committee w/o being gutted.
Then we'll see if he's got the balls to veto, my guess is no....
CP ;>)
"I did not like fascists when I fought them as a diplomat for 23 years and I don't like them now in my own country." - retired American diplomat Joe Wilson